Fleishman et al have submitted a critique of a paper previously published in this same journal by Malone, Dooley and Bradbury. This submission represents our response to the critique by Fleishman et al. This submission reiterates our position that polling the public writ large as to the value of CCS research is not a technically sound way of understanding how CCS technologies might deploy in the future.
Revised: April 13, 2012 |
Published: March 26, 2012
Citation
Dooley J.J., E.L. Malone, and J.A. Bradbury. 2012.Response to “The value of CCS public opinion research” by Fleishman et al. (2011).International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control 7.PNNL-SA-82506.doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2011.09.003