May 10, 2007
Journal Article

Comparison of porous and nonporous materials for methane storage

Abstract

Sublimed, low-density p-tert-buytlcalix(4)arene absorbs methane more readily at room temperature and 1 atm pressure than do either single wall carbon nanotubes (SWNT) or a comparaitive porous metal-organic framework (MOF-1).

Revised: May 15, 2007 | Published: May 10, 2007

Citation

Thallapally P.K., K.A. Kirby, and J.L. Atwood. 2007. Comparison of porous and nonporous materials for methane storage. New Journal of Chemistry 31, no. 5:628-630. PNNL-SA-52566. doi:10.1039/b610321a