Distributed Wind

Enabling wind energy for on-site
and local power generation

Distributed Wind Project Database

The PNNL research team continually collects cost, incentive, generation, and customer data from turbine manufacturers, operations and maintenance providers, state and federal agencies, and other stakeholders for distributed wind projects installed in the United States. These data are critical for identifying trends and opportunities for growth, as well as prioritizing investments for both the Department of Energy’s Wind Energy Technologies Office and industry stakeholders. Making this information available allows interested parties to better understand distributed wind market trends and characteristics. Additional information can be found on PNNL's distributed wind research webpage.

A selection of the characteristics tracked for each project in the dataset is displayed below. This table may be searched, filtered, or sorted to quickly identify projects based on their location, year online, project capacity, turbine capacity, turbine manufacturer & model, installer or developer, owner, or power purchaser. The visual table display also notes whether or not the wind turbines are integrated with other distributed energy resources as part of a hybrid project.

For a tutorial on how to use the database, please watch this demonstration video.

58 results found
Filters applied: Hybrid Power System
Project Name Sort descending County State Year Online Project Capacity (kW) Turbine Nominal Capacity (kW) [Units] Turbine Manufacturer / Model Name Hybrid Type (Other DERs) Installer or Developer Owner / Power Purchaser
Alameda County’s Santa Rita Jail Microgrid CA 2012 12.00 2.40 [5] / Skystream 3.7 Hybrid Power System (CHP, diesel, solar PV, storage) Chevron Energy Solutions
Alaska Installation Nome AK 2008 750.00 50.00 [15] Entegrity Wind Systems Inc. / EW50 Hybrid Power System (diesel) Western Community Energy Bering Straits Native Corp., Sitnasuak Native Corp. / Bering Straits Native Corp., Sitnasuak Native Corp.
Amern - S & C IL 2016 100.00 100.00 [1] Northern Power Systems / NPS 100B-24 Hybrid Power System (natural gas, solar PV, storage) Northern Power Systems, S&C Electric
Audobon PA 2019 3.60 3.60 [1] WindStax Energy / WindStax 40 Hybrid Power System (storage) WindStax Energy
California Installation CA 2021 10.00 10.00 [1] Bergey WindPower / Excel 10 Hybrid Power System (solar PV) Energy Options Customer /
California Installation CA 2021 1.70 1.70 [1] Pika Energy / Pika 1.7 Hybrid Power System (solar PV) Energy Options Customer /
Dynapower Chittenden VT 2010 100.00 100.00 [1] Northern Power Systems / NPS 100B-21 Hybrid Power System (solar PV, storage) Alteris Renewables Dynapower / Dynapower
Eaton PA 2019 3.60 3.60 [1] WindStax Energy / WindStax 40 Hybrid Power System (storage) WindStax Energy
EIC PA 2019 3.60 3.60 [1] WindStax Energy / WindStax 40 Hybrid Power System (storage) WindStax Energy
Harbec Plastics Wayne NY 2012 850.00 850.00 [1] Gamesa / G58 Hybrid Power System (fossil, solar PV) Harvest the Wind Northern Developments, LLC / Harbec Plastics
Harmar PA 2019 10.80 5.40 [2] WindStax Energy / WindStax 60 Hybrid Power System (solar PV, storage) WindStax Energy
Hawaii Waste Water Treatment HI 2013 100.00 100.00 [1] Northern Power Systems / NPS 100B-21 Arctic Hybrid Power System (storage) Gen-X Energy Development, LLC Municipality /
Holy Love OH 2015 200.00 100.00 [2] Northern Power Systems / NPS 100B-24 Hybrid Power System (solar PV, storage) Wind Turbines of Ohio
Holy Love OH 2016 10.00 10.00 [1] Bergey WindPower / Excel 10 Hybrid Power System (solar PV, storage) Wind Turbines of Ohio
Illinois Institute of Technology Cook IL 2011 10.00 10.00 [1] Bergey WindPower / Excel 10 Hybrid Power System (natural gas, solar PV, storage) Illinois Institute of Technology Illinois Institute of Technology /
Inland Empire Utility Agency (IEUA) San Bernadino CA 2011 1,000.00 1,000.00 [1] Mitsubishi / MWT62/1.0 Hybrid Power System (CHP, diesel, solar PV, storage) Foundation Windpower Foundation Windpower / Inland Empire Utility Agency
Island Beach State Park Restroom Facility Ocean NJ 2013 1.50 1.50 [1] Bornay / Wind 13+ Hybrid Power System (solar PV, solar hot water, propane, storage) Skylands Renewable Energy, LLC
Kansas Installation KS 2013 90.00 [1] Halus/Vestas / V17 Hybrid Power System (diesel, storage) Sustainable Power Systems, Halus
Kodiak - Pillar Mtn AK 2012 4,500.00 1,500.00 [3] GE Renewable Energy / 1.5 Hybrid Power System (hydro, diesel, storage)
Kodiak - Pillar Mtn AK 2009 4,500.00 1,500.00 [3] GE Renewable Energy / 1.5 Hybrid Power System (hydro, diesel, storage)

Download

In addition to the fields shown in the visual display table, the full dataset includes (as applicable and when available) each project’s interconnection type, customer type, tower type and height, annual energy generation value(s), incentive payment(s), estimated installed cost, U.S. Energy Information Administration plant identification number, U.S. Wind Turbine Database case identification number, and other characteristics.

To download the full dataset as an Excel spreadsheet, you must register a name and validated email address.

Sharing your contact information will also allow us to provide you with notices of future updates.

Download Data

Suggestions

Please note that the dataset is not complete or perfect and we welcome your input. There may be duplicate entries and there are many incomplete entries. If you have information to share that would improve this dataset, including new or missing projects, or additional information on existing projects, please contact PNNL with this email link.

Rural Electric Cooperatives

Thank you to our collaboration partner, the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association's RADWIND Project team, for their instrumental role in and funding for the development of this dataset display. The full, downloadable dataset includes the owner, interconnecting utility, and power purchaser for each project (as applicable and when available). This will allow cooperatives to identify distributed wind projects in cooperative territories and whether the projects are cooperative-owned, consumer-member owned, or if the energy is purchased by a cooperative.