Distributed Wind

Enabling wind energy for on-site
and local power generation

Distributed Wind Project Database

The PNNL research team continually collects cost, incentive, generation, and customer data from turbine manufacturers, operations and maintenance providers, state and federal agencies, and other stakeholders for distributed wind projects installed in the United States. These data are critical for identifying trends and opportunities for growth, as well as prioritizing investments for both the Department of Energy’s Wind Energy Technologies Office and industry stakeholders. Making this information available allows interested parties to better understand distributed wind market trends and characteristics. Additional information can be found on PNNL's distributed wind research webpage.

A selection of the characteristics tracked for each project in the dataset is displayed below. This table may be searched, filtered, or sorted to quickly identify projects based on their location, year online, project capacity, turbine capacity, turbine manufacturer & model, installer or developer, owner, or power purchaser. The visual table display also notes whether or not the wind turbines are integrated with other distributed energy resources as part of a hybrid project.

For a tutorial on how to use the database, please watch this demonstration video.

8 results found
Filters applied: Clipper, Helix
Project Name Sort descending County State Year Online Project Capacity (kW) Turbine Nominal Capacity (kW) [Units] Turbine Manufacturer / Model Name Hybrid Type (Other DERs) Installer or Developer Owner / Power Purchaser
Cashton Greens Monroe WI 2012 5,000.00 2,500.00 [2] Clipper / Liberty C96 Organic Valley Cooperative, Gundersen Lutheran Health System Gundersen Lutheran Health System, Organic Valley Cooperative / Upper Midwest Municipal Power Agency
Eolos Dakota MN 2011 2,500.00 2,500.00 [1] Clipper / Liberty C96 University of Minnesota University of Minnesota /
GL Wind Winona MN 2011 5,000.00 2,500.00 [2] Clipper / Liberty C96 Juhl Energy, Gundersen Lutheran Health System GL Wind / Dairyland Power Cooperative
Iowa Installation Black Hawk IA 2009 4.50 4.50 [1] Helix / Natural Solutions
Iowa Installation Clayton IA 2009 4.50 4.50 [1] Helix /
Kirkwood Community College Linn IA 2012 2,500.00 2,500.00 [1] Clipper / C-96 Kirkwood Community College Kirkwood Community College / Interstate Power & Light Company
Turbine ADAM Lee IL 2007 2,500.00 2,500.00 [1] Clipper / C-93 FPC Services, GSG Wind GSG 3, LLC /
Turbine EVE Lee IL 2012 2,500.00 2,500.00 [1] Clipper / C-96 GSG 7, LLC GSG 7, LLC /

Download

In addition to the fields shown in the visual display table, the full dataset includes (as applicable and when available) each project’s interconnection type, customer type, tower type and height, annual energy generation value(s), incentive payment(s), estimated installed cost, U.S. Energy Information Administration plant identification number, U.S. Wind Turbine Database case identification number, and other characteristics.

To download the full dataset as an Excel spreadsheet, you must register a name and validated email address.

Sharing your contact information will also allow us to provide you with notices of future updates.

Download Data

Suggestions

Please note that the dataset is not complete or perfect and we welcome your input. There may be duplicate entries and there are many incomplete entries. If you have information to share that would improve this dataset, including new or missing projects, or additional information on existing projects, please contact PNNL with this email link.

Rural Electric Cooperatives

Thank you to our collaboration partner, the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association's RADWIND Project team, for their instrumental role in and funding for the development of this dataset display. The full, downloadable dataset includes the owner, interconnecting utility, and power purchaser for each project (as applicable and when available). This will allow cooperatives to identify distributed wind projects in cooperative territories and whether the projects are cooperative-owned, consumer-member owned, or if the energy is purchased by a cooperative.