The strengths of noncovalent interactions are generally very sensitive to a number of geometric parameters. Among the most important of these parameters is the separation between the interacting moieties (in the case of an intermolecular interaction, this would be the intermolecular separation). Most works seeking to characterize the properties of intermolecular interactions are mainly concerned with
binding energies obtained at the potential energy minimum (as determined at some particular level of theory). In this work, in order to extend our understanding of these types of noncovalent interactions, we investigate the distance dependence of several types of intermolecular interactions, these are hydrogen bonds, stacking interactions, dispersion interactions, and X-H· · ·p interactions. There are several methods
that have traditionally been used to treat noncovalent interactions as well as many new methods that have emerged within the past three or four years. Here we obtain reference data using estimated CCSD(T) values at the complete basis set limit (using the CBS(T) method); potential energy curves are also produced using several other methods thought to be accurate for intermolecular interactions, these are MP2/ccpVTZ, MP2/aug-cc-pVDZ,MP2/6-31G*(0.25), SCS(MI)-MP2/cc-pVTZ, estimated MP2.5/CBS, DFT-SAPT/ aug-cc-pVTZ, DFT/M06-2X/6-311+G(2df,2p), and DFT-D/TPSS/6-311++G(3df,3pd). The basis set superposition error is systematically considered throughout the study. It is found that the MP2.5 and DFTSAPT methods, which are both quite computationally intensive, produce potential energy curves that are in very good agreement to those of the reference method. Among the MP2 techniques, which can be said to be of medium computational expense, the best results are obtained with MP2/cc-pVTZ and SCS(MI)-MP2/cc-pVTZ. DFT-D/TPSS/6-311++G(3df,3pd) is the DFT-based method that can be said to
give the most well-balanced description of intermolecular interactions.
Revised: February 18, 2011 |
Published: December 9, 2009
Citation
Riley K.E., M. Pitonak, J. Cerny, and P. Hobza. 2009.On the Structure and Geometry of Biomolecular Binding Motifs (Hydrogen-Bonding, Stacking, X-H· · ·p): WFT and DFT Calculations.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 6, no. 1:66-80. doi:10.1021/ct900376r