This report evaluates the scope and effectiveness of the public participation pr
ograms, including Site-Specific Advisory Boards (SSABs), at seven U.S. Departmen
t of Energy (DOE) sites: Fernald, Hanford, Los Alamos, Nevada, Oak Ridge, Paduc
ah, and Savannah River. The primary purpose of the study is to assist both DOE
Field and Headquarters managers in reviewing and understanding lessons learned o
ver the past decade concerning public participation programs administered by the
DOE Office of Environmental Management (EM). The evaluation provides a snapsh
ot of selected EM public participation programs at a particular point of time.
It is based on interviews and site visits conducted between January and June 200
2- a time of change within the program. The study focuses on public participati
on programs that incorporate a variety of activities and address a wide range of individual site activities and decisions. It uses the Acceptability Diamond as
an evaluative framework to answer questions about stakeholders' experiences wit
h, and assessment of, DOE-EM's public participation programs. The Acceptability
Diamond, which was developed by researchers from the Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory in previous research, identifies four program dimensions - substanti
ve issues, decision-making process, relationships, and accountability - that det
ermine the effectiveness of an agency's interactions with local communities. Es
sentially, a public participation program may be deemed effective to the extent
that it provides for open disclosure and addresses all four acceptability dimens
ions in ways that are appropriate and effective for a particular community and s
ituation. This framework provides a guide for agencies to 1) set objectives, 2)
design public participation and oversight programs, and 3) set criteria for eva
luating program effectiveness. In the current study, where the framework is use
d as a means of assessing program effectiveness, the focus is on stakeholders' p
erspectives of public participation: on the nature of DOE-EM's public disclosure
and the four interrelated dimensions of DOE-EM's interactions with its neighbor
ing communities
Revised: August 5, 2008 |
Published: February 28, 2003