April 30, 2018
Feature

Sulfate Aerosols: Sources and Effects on Arctic Climate

Scientists found that cooling from sulfate aerosols can partially offset Arctic warming from absorbing aerosols

Yang_Ice_ArcticSulfate

New research shows that sulfate aerosol sources with shorter transport pathways and meteorology favoring longer aerosol lifetimes are more efficient in influencing energy balance changes in the Arctic.

The Science

Long-range transport of aerosols from mid-latitudes in the Northern Hemisphere can increase aerosol concentrations in the Arctic. Depending on the source, these aerosols perturb the Arctic energy balance by absorbing or scattering energy, heating or cooling the atmosphere and surface.

Scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory analyzed 16 source regions or sectors of sulfate aerosols to determine how much influence each individual source exerts on energy balance in the Arctic.

The Impact

Researchers found that meteorology drives the seasonality of contributions to Arctic sulfate concentrations from remote sources, and cooling from sulfates can partially offset Arctic warming from absorbing aerosols, such as black carbon. Knowing the source of sulfate in the Arctic and its contribution to energy balance is important for understanding Arctic climate change.

Summary

Sulfate compounds (commonly called sulfate) are produced by power plants and industrial processes, and are also found in nature. These aerosols can affect Earth's energy balance by scattering heat from the sun.

To quantify these interactions and their influence on Arctic climate, researchers performed simulations using the Community Earth System Model equipped with an explicit sulfur source tagging technique, time-varying sulfur dioxide emissions, and meteorological conditions for the time period of 2010-2014. They found that regions with high emissions and/or near or within the Arctic presented relatively large contributions to Arctic sulfate burden. The largest contribution came from sources in East Asia (27 percent).

Researchers also found that meteorology strongly influenced seasonal variations in the contribution to Arctic sulfate concentrations from remote sources. The mean cooling effect on energy balance from sulfate aerosols offsets the positive top-of-the-atmosphere warming effect from black carbon by one-third. A 20 percent global reduction in sulfur dioxide emissions led to a net Arctic top-of-the-atmosphere warming of 0.02 W m-2.

These findings suggest that jointly reducing future black carbon and sulfur dioxide emissions could prevent at least some of the Arctic warming that would result from reductions in sulfur dioxide emissions alone. Calculations also indicate that sources with shorter transport pathways and meteorology favoring longer aerosol lifetimes are more efficient in influencing the Arctic energy balance changes.

This study concluded that current sulfur emissions would result in an equilibrium Arctic cooling of about -0.19 K, with -0.05 K of that from sources in East Asia.

Acknowledgments

Sponsors: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of ScienceBiological and Environmental Research supported this research as part of the Regional and Global Climate Modeling program for the High-Latitude Application and Testing of Global and Regional Climate Models (HiLAT) projectNASA's Atmospheric Composition Modeling and Analysis Program and the Climate Change Division of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency also supported this research.

User Facility: The research used computational resources at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center (NERSC), a DOE Office of Science user facility.

Reference: Y. Yang, H. Wang, S.J. Smith, R.C. Easter, P.J. Rasch, "Sulfate Aerosol in the Arctic: Source Attribution and Radiative Forcing." Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 123, 1899-1918 (2018). [DOI: 10.1002/2017JD027298]

Key Capabilities

Download Publication

###

About PNNL

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory draws on its distinguishing strengths in chemistry, Earth sciences, biology and data science to advance scientific knowledge and address challenges in sustainable energy and national security. Founded in 1965, PNNL is operated by Battelle for the Department of Energy’s Office of Science, which is the single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States. DOE’s Office of Science is working to address some of the most pressing challenges of our time. For more information, visit https://www.energy.gov/science/. For more information on PNNL, visit PNNL's News Center. Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and Instagram.

Published: April 30, 2018

PNNL Research Team

Yang Yang, Hailong Wang, Steven J. Smith (Joint Global Change Research Institute), Richard C. Easter, and Philip J. Rasch