PNNL

Abstract

Vertex reordering is a way to improve locality in graph computations. Given an input (or ``natural'') order, reordering aims to compute an alternate permutation of the vertices that is aimed at maximizing a locality-based objective. Given decades of research on this topic, there are tens of graph reordering schemes, and there are also several linear arrangement ``gap'' measures for treatment as objectives. However, a comprehensive empirical analysis of the efficacy of the ordering schemes against the different gap measures, and against real-world applications is currently lacking. In this study, we present an extensive empirical evaluation of up to 11 ordering schemes, taken from different classes of approaches, on a set of 34 real-world graphs emerging from different application domains. Our study is presented in two parts: a) a thorough comparative evaluation of the different ordering schemes on their effectiveness to optimize different linear arrangement gap measures, relevant to preserving locality; and b) extensive evaluation of the impact of the ordering schemes on two real-world, parallel graph applications, namely, community detection and influence maximization. Our studies show a significant divergence among the ordering schemes (up to $40\times$ between the best and the poor) in their effectiveness to reduce the gap measures; and a wide ranging impact of the ordering schemes on various aspects including application runtime (up to $4\times$), memory and cache use, load balancing, and parallel work and efficiency. The comparative study also help reveal the nuances of a parallel environment (compared to serial) on the ordering schemes and their role in optimizing applications.