Public trust of scientific research is often affected by the clarity of published conclusions and also the perceived transparency of the method. Even among scientists, there is often a skeptical reception to new research because of difficulty and sometimes inability to recreate or reproduce the result. The silent crisis of irreproducibility has many potential contributing factors, including: pressure to publish groundbreaking results, the difficulty of a single peer expert to fully review multi-disciplinary team science endeavors, and perceived lack of scientific credit for replicating or disproving a previous result. Although irreproducibility is not exclusive to biology, strong public interest in environmental and biomedical discoveries seems to have focused the spotlight here following a number of high profile studies that failed to be reproduced
Revised: October 31, 2019 |
Published: August 9, 2019
Citation
Petyuk V.A., L. Gatto, and S.H. Payne. 2019.Reproducibility and Transparency by Design.Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 18, no. 8 suppl 1:S202-S204.PNNL-SA-111442.doi:10.1074/mcp.IP119.001567