December 24, 2020
Journal Article

Quantitative Cu counting methodologies for Cu/SSZ-13 selective catalytic reduction catalysts by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy

Abstract

Two Cu/SSZ-13 selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts with distinct Si/Al ratios and isolated Z2Cu and ZCuOH distributions are prepared for in situ electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopic studies. These in situ studies include dehydration, titration of dehydrated samples with NO+O2 and NH3, titration of NH3 saturated samples with NO+O2, and finally steady-state standard NH3-SCR reaction. During dehydration, EPR active hydrated ZCuOH loses H2O ligands and becomes EPR silent due to a pseudo Jahn-Teller effect; a portion of ZCuOH also undergoes autoreduction to ZCu(I) species, a process that also induces EPR invisibility. During NO+O2 treatment of dehydrated samples, ZCu(I) species are oxidized to Cu(II)-NO3- species, regaining EPR visibility. During NH3 titration, EPR silent dehydrated ZCuOH can also regain EPR visibility by coordinating with NH3 ligands. During NO+O2 titration of NH3-saturated samples, EPR active Cu contents first decrease due to Cu(II) reduction to Cu(I), and then increase due to Cu(II)-NO3- species formation. However, the Cu(II)-NO3- formation chemistry is substantially slower for the Si/Al = 36 catalyst. In steady-state SCR studies, the EPR active content decreases with increasing temperature in the kinetically controlled low-temperature regime and becomes largely invariant in mass-transfer limited regime. Importantly, Cu sites in the SCR more active Si/Al = 6 catalyst display substantially higher EPR visibility than the SCR less active Si/Al = 36 catalyst at any reaction temperatures tested. The higher Cu loading for the former catalyst is believed to be key for this difference.

Revised: January 12, 2021 | Published: December 24, 2020

Citation

Zhang Y., Y. Wu, Y. Peng, J. Li, E.D. Walter, Y. Chen, and N.M. Washton, et al. 2020. Quantitative Cu counting methodologies for Cu/SSZ-13 selective catalytic reduction catalysts by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Journal of Physical Chemistry C 124, no. 51:28061–28073. PNNL-SA-156011. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c07971