PNNL

Abstract

Understanding the adhesive and interfacial fracture is important for developing and achieving better adhesive jointing in bi-materials, the location which becomes less vulnerable in engineered structure components. However, to characterize the fracturing behavior of various adhesively-bonded materials, it was shown in this work that the Mode I fracture energies estimated from conventional methods (e.g., work-of-fracture, (modified) compliance calibration method, (modified) beam theory, etc.) can be strongly affected by adherent thickness, adhesive bond length, and material type. Consequently, this hindered the proper understanding of fracturing in adhesive jointing of bi-materials since the estimated fracture energies can exhibit unreasonable difference among various material combinations, thus leading to the confusion in the literature due to the unfair comparison on these non-objective results estimated by leveraging conventional methods on the specimens with different geometries. This work compared size effect method with conventional methods on the calculation of the Mode I fracture energies of metal-metal, metal-CFRP, and CFRP-CFRP material combinations via Double Cantilever Beam (DCB) tests. The results showed that the estimated fracture energies of various material combinations are not dependent on the specimen geometries. This aspect allowed the fair comparison particularly on the interfacial fracturing between metal/adhesive and CFRP/adhesive, and the difference was further explained and correlated with the damage morphology on the material surface after failure identified through three-dimensional profilometer..