An assessment of the potential risks to ecological
resources from remediation activities or other perturbations
should involve a quantitative evaluation of resources on the
remediation site and in the surrounding environment. We
developed a risk methodology to rapidly evaluate potential
impact on ecological resources for the U.S. Department of
Energy’s Hanford Site in southcentral Washington State.
We describe the application of the risk evaluation for two
case studies to illustrate its applicability. The ecological
assessment involves examining previous sources of information
for the site, defining different resource levels from 0
to 5. We also developed a risk rating scale from nondiscernable
to very high. Field assessment is the critical step
to determine resource levels or to determine if current
conditions are the same as previously evaluated. We provide
a rapid assessment method for current ecological
conditions that can be compared to previous site-specific
data, or that can be used to assess resource value on other
sites where ecological information is not generally available.
The method is applicable to other Department of
Energy’s sites, where its development may involve a range
of state regulators, resource trustees, Tribes and other stakeholders. Achieving consistency across Department of
Energy’s sites for valuation of ecological resources on
remediation sites will assure Congress and the public that
funds and personnel are being deployed appropriately.
Revised: November 3, 2020 |
Published: March 1, 2017
Citation
Burger J., M. Gochfeld, A.L. Bunn, J.L. Downs, C. Jeitner, T. Pittfield, and J.A. Salisbury, et al. 2017.A Methodology to Evaluate Ecological Resources and Risk Using Two Case Studies at the Department of Energy’s Hanford Site.Environmental Management 59, no. 3:357-372.PNNL-SA-124297.doi:10.1007/s00267-016-0798-8