PNNL

Abstract

The mission of the Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) is to advance nuclear power as a resource capable of meeting the nation’s energy, environmental, and national security needs by resolving technical, cost, safety, proliferation resistance, and security barriers through Research, Development, and Demonstration (RD&D). To assist in accomplishing this, DOE-NE has established the Gateway for Accelerated Innovation in Nuclear (GAIN) to provide the nuclear community with access to the technical, regulatory, and financial support necessary to move innovative nuclear energy technologies toward commercialization. As part of this program, a GAIN Voucher was awarded to the Columbia Basin Consulting Group (CBCG) to develop for the Lead-Bismuth Reactor (LBR): (1) a means of meeting Chapter 15 requirements and (2) to perform an assessment against a gap analysis developed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for Chapter 15. These two assessments will determine to what extent the LBR can adapt to or meet the Chapter 15 Accident Analysis requirements, and determine gaps that may still exist and what additional information is needed in order to close them. The CBCG LBR design is being developed with a high level of passive safety. It has the advantages of the classical liquid metal reactor, i.e. small size and passive safety, while having the additional advantage of a chemically inert coolant. The CBCG and the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) collaborated to develop an initial licensing pathway for the CBCG Lead-Bismuth conceptual reactor design. It was found that the reactor is well along the licensing pathway and is licensable although some additional design information is needed to establish a complete licensing basis. The missing information is identified in this report and it is noted that much of the missing information can be obtained from the Fast Flux Test Facility (FFTF), a DOE liquid metal test reactor. It was also found that the traditional Chapter 15 requirements for assessing the response of a reactor to possible accident sequences can be adapted to the LBR concept. The Chapter 15 review examined several classes of initiating events and accidents that are normally covered in Chapter 15: reactivity initiated events, reduction in heat removal events, local fuel failure events, and events initiated on the steam supply side. Although some design information is lacking at present, the LBR can be expected to respond as required by Chapter 15 requirements to almost all of the first three events. For events initiated on the steam side, design information is lacking and so conclusions cannot be reached at present. On the other hand, it should be quite possible to develop the design information for the steam supply side and the impact of events initiated on this side can be assessed in a subsequent study.