PNNL

Abstract

We study the cloud response to a +4K surface warming in a new multi- scale climate model that uses enough interior resolution to begin explicitly resolving boundary layer turbulence (i.e. Ultra-Parameterization or UP), and the associated low clouds. UP's predictions are compared against those from standard Super-Parameterization (SP). The mean global cloud feedback turns out to be remarkably neutral across all of our simulations, despite some radical changes in both cloud microphysical parameter settings and cloud resolving model grid resolution. The overall cloud response to warming is the positive low-cloud feedbacks over land, negative feedbacks at high latitudes, and weak feedbacks over the low-latitude oceans. The most distinct effects of UP appear to be the result of tuning decisions impacting high latitude cloud feedback. UP's microphysics are tuned to optimize the model present-day, top-of-atmosphere radiation fluxes against CERES observations, by lowering the cloud ice-liquid phase-shift temperature ramp, adjusting the ice/liquid autoconversion rate, and increasing the ice fall speed. This reduces baseline high-latitude low cloud amounts, damping the phase change cloud feedback at high latitudes, leading to a slightly more positive global cloud feedback compared to SP. A sensitivity test that isolates these microphysical impacts from UP's grid resolution conrms that the microphysical settings are mostly responsible for the dierences between SP and UP cloud feedback.