January 2, 2020
Journal Article

Evaluation of a Geotechnical Compaction Model to Estimate Sediment Deformation

Abstract

When surface ruts from vehicle activity occur above archeological deposits, there is a potential for an impact to the archeological record to occur. While impacts to the soil surface are relatively straightforward to describe, sub-surface disturbances are more difficult to quantify. In particular, disturbances to buried archeological materials can be difficult to characterize. Materials can be damaged by surface disturbances, but they can also be impacted even if they stay intact. Interpretation of intact materials relocated within the sediment column can be problematic. Traditional characterization methods (e.g. excavation) can also disturb archaeological materials. Here, we present a geotechnical compaction model that can be used to assist with sub-surface characterization under vehicle ruts formed during off-road travel. The model is based on a Boussinesq analysis of stress increase below a surface load. The change in bulk density resulting from compaction is assumed to be proportional to the stress increase. The model results were compared against pilot scale tests conducted with homogeneous sediment and field scale in-situ tests. The results indicate that the model generally agreed with measurements to within 20%, although only a single soil type was evaluated in these studies, with a narrow range of initial bulk densities and rut depths. While application of the model across a broader matrix of soil types, bulk densities and rut depths would increase confidence in the model, it appears that the model may be suitable for use in archeological field investigations. Potential uses include both compliance and research based field applications.

Revised: April 10, 2020 | Published: January 2, 2020

Citation

Fritz B.G., D.P. McFarland, and N. Phillips. 2020. Evaluation of a Geotechnical Compaction Model to Estimate Sediment Deformation. Archaeological Prospection 27, no. 1:55-62. PNNL-SA-139906. doi:10.1002/arp.1757