March 13, 2002
Conference Paper

Comparing Paper and Tangible, Multimodal Tools

Abstract

Officers in command posts maintain situational awareness using paper maps, Post-it notes, and hand-written annotations. They do so because paper is robust to failure, it is portable and malleable, it offers ultra-high resolution and supports face-to-face collaboration. We report herein on an evaluation comparing maps and Post-its with a tangible multimodal system called Rasa that augments the paper tools with sensors, enabling it to recognize the multimodal language (both written and spoken) that naturally occurs there. In this study, we found that not only do users prefer Rasa to paper alone, they find it as easy or easier to use than paper tools. Moreover, Rasa introduces no discernible overhead in its operation other than error repair, yet grants the benefits inherent in digital systems. Finally, subjects confirmed that by combining physical and computational tools, Rasa is resistant to computational failure.

Revised: September 26, 2002 | Published: March 13, 2002

Citation

McGee D.R., P.R. Cohen, R.M. Wesson, and S. Horman. 2002. Comparing Paper and Tangible, Multimodal Tools. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Changing Our World, Changing Ourselves, 407-414. Minneapolis, Minnesota:ACM Press. PNWD-SA-5590.