POINT/COUNTERPOINT: The LNT model is appropriate for the estimation of risk from low-level (less than 100 mSv/year) radiation, and low levels of radon in homes should be considered harmful to health

April 16, 2021

Journal Article

POINT/COUNTERPOINT: The LNT model is appropriate for the estimation of risk from low-level (less than 100 mSv/year) radiation, and low levels of radon in homes should be considered harmful to health

Abstract

This is a "Point/Counterpoint" editorial in which PNNL's Daniel J. Strom favored both propositions and rebutted both Bernard L. Cohen (University of Pittsburgh, Emeritus Professor) and John Cameron (University of Wisconsin, Emeritus Professor). Dr. Strom contends that the linear, nonthreshold (LNT) dose-response model is appropirate for radiation protection purposes, even though it does not fit all data for cancer mortality. Dr. Strom also reviews the evidence for carcinogenicity of low-levels of radon found in homes, and concludes that they are hazardous.

Published: April 16, 2021

Citation

Strom D.J., J.R. Cameron, and B.L. Cohen. 1998. POINT/COUNTERPOINT: The LNT model is appropriate for the estimation of risk from low-level (less than 100 mSv/year) radiation, and low levels of radon in homes should be considered harmful to health. Medical Physics 25, no. 3:273-278. PNNL-SA-36965. doi:10.1118/1.598207