PNNL

Abstract

The Hanford Tank Operations Contractor, Washington River Protection Solutions, conducted comparison tests of two Hanford Waste tank vapor sampling systems to determine the relative differences in quantifying Chemicals of Potential Concern (COPC) while sampling the same waste tank. The systems are the traditional in situ, inline headspace sampling (HS) method and the recently developed slipstream sampling unit for testing respirator chemical cartridges known as the cartridge test (CT) rig. The comparison test was performed to determine if results obtained using the CT rig are similar to results obtained using the traditional HS method. Using the CT rig would provide efficiencies in headspace vapors sampling such as applying ALARA principles, minimizing worker entries to the tank farms, and eliminating the physical strain of manually lowering the headspace sampling bundles into the waste tanks. Six sampling events were conducted during January and February 2018 to collect headspace vapor samples from Hanford tank BY-110 with the two systems. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory was tasked with conducting an analysis of the analytical results to assess the comparability of the sampling methods and make recommendations on future testing or deployment of the CT method.