In the comments made by Manceau1 on the study by Sassi and Rosso,2 some concerns were raised regarding the potential for the structure theoretically found and identified as
ferrihydrite (Michel model3 ) to be hydromaghemite. Here, we address these concerns by showing that the structure theoretically generated cannot be unambiguously compared
to hydromaghemite. Many of the concerns raised are, in fact, oblique to the given study. Notwithstanding, we reiterate clearly stated methodological details and caveats regarding the theoretical structural search performed, which disallow for the hydromaghemite prospect to manifest. We furthermore highlight the scholarly importance of examining experimental X-ray diffraction (XRD) and pair distribution function (PDF) of synthesized ferrihydrite samples from a variety of independent sources, as embodied in a broader set of relevant literature.
Revised: April 10, 2020 |
Published: August 15, 2019
Citation
Sassi M., and K.M. Rosso. 2019.Reply to "Comment on ‘Roles of Hydration and Magnetism on the Structure of Ferrihydrite from First Principles'".ACS Earth and Space Chemistry 3, no. 8:1581-1583.PNNL-SA-147743.doi:10.1021/acsearthspacechem.9b00160