Iron-sulfur clusters play important roles in biology as parts of electron transfer chains and catalytic cofactors. Here, we report a detailed computational analysis of a structural model of the simplest natural iron-sulfur cluster of rubredoxin and its cationic counterparts. Specifically, we report results for the ground and low-lying electronically excited states of the complex [Fe(SCH3)4]2-/1-/2+/3+, using Multi-Reference (CASSCF, MRCISD), and Coupled Cluster [CCSD(T)] methodology in order to provide accurate adiabatic reduction energies, dissociation energies and insights into the bonding analysis. The nature of the Fe-S chemical bond and the magnitude of the ionization potentials in the anionic and cationic [Fe(SCH3)4] complexes offer a physical rationale for the relative stabilization, structure and speciation of these complexes. Anionic and cationic complexes present different types of chemical bonds: prevalently ionic in [Fe(SCH3)4]2-/1- complexes and covalent in [Fe(SCH3)4]2+/3+ complexes. The ionic bonds result in an energy gain for the transition [Fe(SCH3)4]2-®[Fe(SCH3)4]- (i.e., FeII®FeIII) of 1.5 eV, while the covalent bonds result in an energy loss for the transition [Fe(SCH3)4]2+®[Fe(SCH3)4]3+ of 16.6 eV, almost half of the IP of Fe2+. The ionic vs covalent bond character influences the Fe-S bond strength and length, i.e., ionic Fe-S bonds are longer than covalent ones by about 0.2 Å (for FeII) and 0.04 Å (for FeII). Finally, the average Fe-S heterolytic bond strength is 6.7 eV (FeII) and 14.6 (FeIII) eV at the RCCSD(T) level of theory.
Published: November 11, 2021
Citation
Tzeli D., S. Raugei, and S.S. Xantheas. 2021.Quantitative Account of the Bonding Properties of a Rubredoxin Model Complex [Fe(SCH3)4]q, q = -2, -1, +2, +3.Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 17, no. 10:6080-6091.PNNL-SA-162483.doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00485