The ultimate goal of most prognostic systems is accurate prediction of the remaining useful life of individual systems or components based on their use and performance. Traditionally, individual-based prognostic methods use a measure of degradation to make lifetime estimates. Degradation measures may include sensed measurements, such as temperature or vibration level, or inferred measurements, such as model residuals or physics-based model predictions. Often, it is beneficial to combine several measures of degradation into a single parameter. Parameter features such as trendability, monotonicity, and prognosability can be used to compare candidate prognostic parameters to determine which is most useful for individual-based prognosis. By quantifying these features for a given parameter, the metrics can be used with any traditional optimization technique to identify an appropriate parameter. This parameter may be used with a parametric extrapolation model to make prognostic estimates for an individual unit. The proposed methods are illustrated with an application to simulated turbofan engine data.
Revised: May 22, 2013 |
Published: September 30, 2012
Citation
Coble J.B., and W. Hines. 2012.Identifying Suitable Degradation Parameters for Individual-Based Prognostics. In Diagnostics and Prognostics of Engineering Systems: Methods and Techniques, edited by S Kadry. 135-150. Hershey, Pennsylvania:IGI Global.PNNL-SA-83589.