# Sensible and Latent Loads

Some of the content on this page is also discussed on the "Equipment Response to Loads" (previous) page. This content is focused on how the RTU Comparison Calculator accounts for latent loads (see discussion below for an explanation of the outline).

**Evaporator Coil Conditions**: Outside air (ventilation) and indoor air mix before passing the coil. Conditions in the mixed stream depend on weather (outdoor dry and wet bulb) and indoor air (dry bulb set point and room humidity).

**Latent and Sensible System Capacity:**Components of total capacity are based on mixed air conditions.- Rated system capacities and S/T ratio (at AHRI test conditions) are projected to coil conditions.
**ASHRAE**psychrometric routines (thermodynamic properties of moist air)**DOE-2**total-capacity curves for evaporator coils**EnergyPlus**Apparatus Dew Point and Bypass-factor algorithms for calculating latent and sensible components of total capacity

- Rated system capacities and S/T ratio (at AHRI test conditions) are projected to coil conditions.

**Run times**are determined by the system’s sensible- Building
**Sensible**Loads**:**load line established to match (1) the**system**sensible**capacity**at outdoor design conditions and (2) the sensible**internal****loads**when outdoor conditions equal the setpoint. - Building
**Latent**Loads**(condensate):**calculated using S/T ratio at coil conditions and sensible loads (see “LLdE” and “S/T” columns in the bin tables).

- Building

## Discussion:

### Comments on #1:

The analysis of latent and sensible loads starts at the evaporator coil. It’s the conditions at the coil that determine how much of the systems total capacity is available for handling sensible loads and how much of that capacity will be used for dehumidification. The coil conditions are determined by mixed-air calculations that consider the contributions from the two air streams (indoor return air and outdoor ventilation air).

### Comment on #2:

Once coil conditions are known, then the rated capacities can be projected to them. This projection takes the characteristics of the system at AHRI test conditions (Outdoor dry bulb = 95F, Inside dry bulb=80F, Inside wet bulb=67F) and projects to the mixed-air coil conditions in the simulation (as affected by indoor setpoint and weather-bin conditions).

The three sub bullets list the algorithmic sources for the projection calculations. The result of the projection, are sensible and latent capacities at coil conditions.

A significant portion of the computational code of the RTU CC is in support of this step (about 25%).

### Comment on #3:

This bullet starts off with a statement that reflects how a thermostatically controlled air conditioner works. It simply tries to keep the dry-bulb temperature from rising. That is, as sensible loads act to increase the temperature of the room air (and eventually trigger the thermostat), the air conditioner runs (cools the air) until the thermostat says to stop.

Run times are basically the ratio of the sensible load to the sensible capacity. So by establishing the sensible capacity of the system we can determine how long it has to run (to satisfy the thermostat).

The sub bullets here give some detail on the sensible load line (which will probably have been discussed to some degree in previous slides). This bullet describes the two outdoor conditions that establish the line (design and setpoint).

While the unit runs to counteract sensible loads, it also dehumidifies. To calculate condensate formation (latent coil load), the split between sensible and latent capacities (the S/T ratio) and the sensible load (SL), can be used. S/T is short for the ratio of the sensible to total capacities.

LL = TL * L/T = (SL/(S/T)) * (1 - S/T)

This LL (Latent Load) is reported in the RTU CC as the “LLdE” column in the bin calcs. Another column that gives a good indication of how the coil conditions are affecting the sensible and latent capacities is the “S/T” column.

Systems in humid climates will have a lower portion of their capacity available for sensible cooling (lower S/T ratios).

### Assumptions about Indoor Humidity:

The two plots above show the difference between the outside and inside humidity ratio as a function of the outdoor-indoor temperature difference (left is raw hourly; right is daily average). This data is generated from EnergyPlus modeling of a medium sized office building. This shows a positive difference during the summer cooling season (delta T greater than -10), and a negative difference in winter. Summer cooling, and resulting dehumidification, suppresses the indoor humidity ratio.

The RTU CC has two ways of modeling indoor humidity. The default is to assume that that indoor humidity ratio tracks with the outdoor humidity ratio. This assumption produces mixed air (coil conditions) more humid than would be seen in an hourly simulation like EnergyPlus. The corresponding latent coil loads will be higher in the RTU CC than a corresponding hourly model like EnergyPlus. The alternate assumption of fixed indoor humidity, assumes that some other conditioning devise is acting to control the indoor humidity to a fixed level. The latent coil loads of the RTU CC should be similar to that of an hourly simulation which also uses a fixed humidity assumption.